Written by Godinci.
Today, scientist have all the math at hand to calculate very precisely the age of our universe (13.798 billion years) within an error smaller than 0.21%. They can even reconstruct in detail, trough computer simulations, the unfoldment of our universe starting from a singularity that according to the best estimates, and meticulous considerations, has no size at all, yet, contained from within all the past and future energy of our universe.
This Singularity, under the influence of its schizophrenic disorder, underwent a delusional bang that in conformity with the theory of relativity, and first order deep space observational facts, is running away from us with a speed that increases proportional with human stupidity.
While no one knows in what this singularity was exploding, nor in what the universe is expanding, we’re assured that this speeding-up of the universe is not a violation of the law of conservation of energy (which says that you can never take out more energy of a system than initially was put in that system), even though we can all observe that things after an explosion slow down, or move according to the laws of inertia with a constant velocity in interstellar space.
In addition to that, it’s claimed that this empty space contained within the expanding universe is the Higgs field. This so called Higgs field, as a consequence of its David Copperfield like properties, doesn’t only pertains a constant energy-density while undergoing metric expansion, but also outperforms by far Jesus miraculous act of transforming five loaves of bread and two fish into enough food to feed five thousand hungry men (as is written in gospel narrative of Mark 6/38-43) .
Those geniuses do confess however that there is still some room left for script revision since their mathematics allows them only to start from 0, 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001sec after initial ignition-point. Nevertheless, the evolution of this delirious singularity from that point on is pretty well understood by them; they even figured out that after a 100 billion years or so from now the universe will come to a close so horrifying that even St. John will laugh aloud when his envisioned apocalypse knocks at our door.
In case your commonsense fails to bend around these old philosophical ideas of spontaneous creation, its unfolding and final collapse, then this is ashamedly due to your lack of familiarity of hyper spatial hocus-pocus mathematics that can unstring any knotted brain by means of concepts such as dark-energy, dark-matter, nonsensical probabilities, positive and negative energy for tactical cancellation, and black holes that sucks all remaining dirt out of their dubious equations and tunnels it, through use of 7 dimensional drain wholes (portals), into the darkness of parallel universes while hoping that nothing remains entangled in the dimensions we inhabit.
Evidently, science knows that at the end of the day amazing claims require amazing proves, and so, an experiment was setup to detect at least on Higgs boson in the debris of the remnants of billions and billions of smashed protons.
Debris experts, from all over the world, were called to the scene, and after careful observations and round-table debating it was agreed upon, by the secular knights, that traces of the signatures of the Higgs boson were clearly present.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences decided, in December 2013, to immortalize Higgs and the less known François Englert through the process of scientific canonization – i.e. handing-over the noble price. Yet, it’s a well known, and a demonstrable fact, that ‘even in a shit-hole you can always find some nickels for as long the shit-hole is big enough‘.
The worldwide renowned Astrophysicist George F. R. Ellis says; I quote:
“People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations….For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations….You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.”
In other words, what George F.R. is telling us is that we, besides good related observational reasoning, should emphasis on common sense; and that hiding nonsensical things under coherent mathematical nonsense doesn’t make the model truth related.
Of course Stephan Hawking, one of the bestselling theoretical physicists that has proven nothing useful and is in the habit of losing one bet after the other, has declared, on intellectual grounds, that philosophy is dead.
Even though secular priests are able to justify their none-commonsense reasoning by means of ridicules equations that look expensive on cheap toilet paper, it’s easy to see that their constructs aren’t resistant to a clean wipe.
The fact is that no secular scientist (SS) can tell you what matter, energy, charge and consciousness is, they even don’t know how to stop the Fukushami nuclear power plant from leaking.
Although secular science likes to ‘cut things open’ or ‘smash things together’ to come to fundamental insights about the universe and self, it’s not hard to demonstrate that most of their scientific theories, such as the standard model of quantum physics, relativity and Darwinism, that are preached aloud by the high priest of secular science (SS), does in contrast to Zen master Ping-ki-Pong (see picture) fails to pass the scrutiny test.
Of course, those endowed with quantum physical reasoning could always claim that Zen master Ping-ki-Pong, through years of meditation, has succeeded somehow to mentally project certain parts of his body to an inaccessible twilight world; however, Dr. Nut standing in the back of Master Ping-ki-Pong assures us of the fact that during the scrutiny test no quantum tunneling through the dark portal of Master Zen’s body has taken place.
If science, just as Zen master Ping-ki-Pong, want to pass the scrutiny test than science has to reinstate commonsense as a useful and valid investigation tool to come to terms with first order observational facts.
Godinci refuses to accept, not because of predisposition, but grounded on observable facts and related commonsense reasoning, that the principles of the universe are rooted in nonsense; thus, we firmly reject delusional science as a truth related science, and declare therefore openly the Higgs (as professed today) as nothing more than a bag of bricks.